Where to Find the Right Financial Advisor

July 22, 2019

Where to Find the Right Financial Advisor

Searching for the right financial advisor isn’t easy. Urban living has its hurdles as a google search can provide an overwhelming amount of options and the personal connection typically isn’t present. In rural areas, there are few options and sometimes the quality of advisor doesn’t exist. So, where do you start? 


We see investors decide to start working with a financial advisor at various ages based on their individual circumstances. Often a new job, an inheritance, life events such as marriage or divorce, preparation for retirement and education funding are the catalyst to search for an investment advisor. 


The first and most common way to seek out investment advice is through word of mouth. Talking to friends and family regarding their relationship with their financial advisor can be very insightful. More than likely, they’ll be candid both about the positive and negative experience they may have had. If you lean on someone you trust to give you a reference to their financial advisor, be sure they’re not recommending them based off of investment returns, as they can be fleeting, or the recommendation of a “hot stock”. Investment returns alone will not shed light on the potential risk you may be taking on to achieve those gains.


Most investors who do their homework online look for an advisor held to a fiduciary standard - simply meaning someone who does not sell investment products, but rather advises on a fee-only basis and has a legal responsibility to put your needs in front of their own. Fiduciary advisors tend to provide more comprehensive financial advice - considering things such as estate planning (wills, trusts & beneficiaries), retirement planning, investing, taxes, education funding, life insurance and charitable giving when guiding you.


Understanding how your prospective advisor gets compensated is also important. Traditionally, brokers, insurance agents and registered representatives sell financial products such as mutual funds, annuities and insurance and receive commissions on those products. Because part or in some cases all of what they are paid is based on the products they sell, it can create a conflict of interest. Compensation varies on products and there is a possibility the potential commission could influence their recommendations for you. In contrast, fee-only advisors provide transparent advice and typically are compensated based on a percentage of the assets they manage for you. They cannot earn commissions from selling products or trading securities in their clients’ portfolios. Their only source of compensation is the fee paid by their clients. This type of arrangement removes the conflict of interest and leads to objective advice not centered on financial products.


One detail often overlooked when searching for an advisor is “fit”. You should like and trust your advisor as you will be sharing personal information with them that you don’t often share with others, even those that are close to you. Firms and advisors have different styles and philosophies, so make sure you are comfortable partnering with them as they are typically long-term relationships. Is the potential or current advisor accessible? How quickly do they respond to your requests for guidance? Searching out a firm with a track record of dealing with real-life scenarios is important. Experience and knowledge drive good advice. 


February 4, 2025
Deepseek and its Low Cost Claims The final week of January was a whirlwind for the stock market, with tech stocks taking center stage. On Monday, the Nasdaq saw its sharpest decline in over a month following news from China about DeepSeek, a ChatGPT competitor. NVIDIA, a dominant force in AI infrastructure, faced a staggering setback, losing nearly $600 billion in market value - the largest single-day dollar loss in U.S. stock market history. DeepSeek claims to operate at a fraction of the cost of U.S. competitors, requiring less processing memory to train and run. While the long-term implications remain uncertain, this development introduces increased volatility and uncertainty in the near term. Earnings Sensitivity Last week also brought earnings reports from four of the Magnificent Seven, along with other key U.S. companies. So far, 77% of S&P 500 companies that have reported Q4 2024 earnings have exceeded expectations, while 63% have surpassed revenue estimates (FACTSET). Historically, positive earnings surprises have led to modest stock price increases, while negative surprises resulted in declines. However, recent quarters have shown heightened market sensitivity to earnings results. For example, IBM exceeded expectations and issued a strong outlook, leading to a 13% one-day gain. Conversely, Lockheed Martin fell 9% after reporting lower-than-expected revenue and offering cautious guidance. Recently, S&P 500 companies that beat both sales and earnings expectations saw an average stock price gain of 3.6% post-announcement, well above the five-year average of 0.9%. Meanwhile, companies that missed estimates saw an average 5% decline, compared to the historical average of 3.1%. Market Concentration With the S&P 500 trading at above-average earnings multiples, investors are watching earnings reports closely. All 11 sectors of the index are expected to see earnings growth in 2024. Why does this matter? The Magnificent Seven currently make up 30% of the S&P 500’s value and accounted for 50% of the index’s gains in 2024. To sustain market growth, the remaining 493 companies will need to contribute more significantly. While the market has reached new highs over the past two years, those gains have been driven by a small group of companies. For context, the only other time such a limited number of stocks dominated performance over a two-year period was during the late-90s dot-com bubble. This narrow market leadership presents a double-edged sword. On one hand, it raises concerns about whether a handful of companies can continue to outperform. On the other, it creates an opportunity for broader market participation, with the rest of the S&P 500 looking more attractive from a valuation and diversification perspective. Periods of concentrated market leadership often lead to increased volatility as investors weigh sticking with what has worked - the Magnificent Seven - versus diversifying to reduce risk. The S&P 500 is currently top-heavy, with its 10 largest companies accounting for 30% of the index. January managed to post gains, but not without some turbulence. We expect market volatility to rise in 2025, compared to the relative calm of the past two years. Last but not Least - Tariffs Additionally, tariffs have recently moved to the forefront. While new tariffs on Mexico and Canada were announced and then delayed by a month, the U.S. moved forward with tariffs on China. The uncertainty surrounding potential tariff impacts adds another layer of market unpredictability. In summary, markets face increasing uncertainty from new AI competition, earnings sensitivity, narrow leadership, and trade policy developments. While diversification may not have been "in style" in recent years, it remains a valuable tool for managing volatility. As always, investors should maintain a long-term perspective and avoid getting caught up in short-term market swings. If you have questions or concerns about your individual situation, please don’t hesitate to contact us.
July 15, 2024
Over the past few years, the breakdown of the S&P 500 has changed drastically. Although the visual is over a year old, today Nvidia...
Buyback surge
June 28, 2024
It occurs when a company uses excess cash or debt to purchase its own shares. Buybacks are popular because they reduce the number of shares ...
April 8, 2024
In recent weeks, we’ve been asked several times about how to invest given the significant climb in the stock market over the last 5 months. Let’s look back at the recent quarter performance as well as the overall market performance since the October 2023 lows…
February 2, 2024
While most know “Facebook” by its given name, it trades as a stock under the name “Meta”. Years after changing its corporate name to Meta, it still resonates as Facebook to us and likely most of you reading this post.
December 16, 2023
Looking back on our previous post about historical 4th quarter performance, after October it looked like we were staring down a 4th quarter with negative returns.
October 17, 2023
As we enter the early stages of the fourth quarter of the year, the month of September reared its ugly head again in the markets.
August 28, 2023
Trying to avoid having a “short-term memory” when it comes to investing isn’t always easy. Look at last year (2022) - as uncertainty filled the markets...
May 26, 2023
As the Debt Ceiling deadline approaches, we thought it would be timely to discuss what this means and potential implications to the economy and the financial markets.
March 9, 2023
A client shared a great article on the power of dividend investing, worth a read...
More Posts
Share by: